STOP ARMING TERRORIST ACT – HR 608 and S532

Source: H.R. 608 & S 532 The “Stop Arming Terrorists Act

BARACK  OBAMA  AND  HILLARY  CLINTON  SPENT  AMERICAN  TAXPAYER  FUNDS  TO  SUPPORT  TERRORISTS!

A  Bill  is  in  Congress  to  STOP  US  Taxpayer  funding  and  arming  of terrorist  groups    

Pamela Williams

March 15, 2017  

As American taxpayers, we are not foolish enough to think that our money isn’t wrongly spent by the Government every day, but this is another matter entirely. The fact that ‘president’ Obama and Hillary Clinton did something so unbelievably abhorrent that Congress has to pass a bill to insure it never happens again is too much of a betrayal to grasp. 

U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Democrat Representative Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii are involved in introducing legislature to insure against such a betrayal and criminal injustice occurring ever again involving the United States of America.

How did we ever lose our way to even be discussing such a despicable injustice? I hate to tell you, we are still lost! As we speak, the Mainstream News Media, the Powers That Be, the Gobalists, and the Governing ‘Elite’ Liberals of the Obama reign are still calling the shots.

The Clintons are still sitting in the warmth of their home enjoying all their riches and being praised by all their Liberal Followers. And it is not just liberals who follow them.  It is some Republican Traitors like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Paul Ryan who still praise what the Clintons have done. 

The whole premise behind the takeover of countries and murder of their leaders is the method of madness by how Hillary Clinton operates. Oh, but she does not operate alone. She and Obama were a match made in hell!

The U.S. government “regime change” schemes overseas that involve providing money, weapons, training, and other support to savage terror organizations was what Hillary Clinton has given her life to. Of course, aiding designated terror groups is already a serious crime, but the laws have not been enforced against federal officials involved in these war crimes.  AND WHY NOT???

This is how Hillary would do it:

1. Enter target country under false pretenses.
2. Threaten country to join her or die.
3. Put together a rebel group from the Muslim Brotherhood to take down country, while killing populace, tearing down architecture, and leaving country in ruin.
4. Funds rebels to fight with arms and machines paid for by the American taxpayer.
5. All the while rebels share with ISIS their weapons.
6. Lo and behold ISIS is being funded by American taxpayers, too, and supported by Obama and Clinton….oh, and John McCain.
7. Leader of country is savagely murdered.
8. Country’s riches, resources and land stolen by Obama and Clinton.
9. Gas pipeline built.
10. Citizens abused and trafficked.
11. Country is left as void for terrorists to fill.

H.R. 608 in the House, bans the provision of any assistance by the federal government to al-Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, and the Islamic State, sometimes known as ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh. 

The “Stop Arming Terrorists Act,” as it is being dubbed, would also prohibit official U.S. aid to any individual or group affiliated with, associated with, or cooperating with any of the proscribed terror organizations. 

Finally, the legislation bans any funds to state sponsors of those groups.  Providing anything from cash and weapons to training and intelligence would be prohibited under the bill.

Senator Paul, a leading constitutionalist Congressman, introduced the “Stop Arming Terrorists Act” last week in the Senate as S. 532.   

“One of the unintended consequences of nation-building and open-ended intervention is American funds and weapons benefiting those who hate us,” Senator Paul said in a statement announcing that the companion legislation to the House measure had been filed. “This legislation will strengthen our foreign policy, enhance our national security, and safeguard our resources.” 

Like his father, retired Congressman and GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul, Senator Paul has been a long time critic of the U.S. government’s illegal policies arming terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda.

I hate to sound stupid, but I was not aware this was occurring until I discovered what Hillary Clinton and Obama were doing in Libya.  I will never forget hearing Hillary say on the tube, “We came, we saw, he died.”  She laughed at the gruesome death of Muammar Gaddafi.  She and her Team had won, and nothing mattered more to Hillary than winning.  Her followers continue to haunt America as they refuse to accept Donald Trump as the new President, thus again abusing the rights of the American citizens.

Hillary has never paid a dime or a day for her crimes, and it honestly does not look like she will.  Unless the honorable AG Jeff Sessions can take action against her, she will die never having spent a day paying for what she has done.  However, I know what awaits her when she dies.  

Hillary is a follower of Saul Alinsky who taught his followers that the only thing that mattered was “power”…at any cost.  The means justifies the end, and that end should be power.  Oh, by the way, Obama also is a follower of Saul Alinsky.  That fact provides us with some insight into the character of both Obama and Hillary Clinton.

https://counterjihadreport.com/2017/03/15/congress-considers-bill-to-stop-arming-terrorists/LINK

At this point the evidence of U.S. government support for terrorists is overwhelming, with President Trump going so far as to call Obama and Hillary Clinton co-founders of ISIS

As The New American has documented extensively, official U.S. intelligence documents show that multiple Western and Islamic governments allied with Washington, D.C., have also supported ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other terror groups in Syria. In fact, the Obama administration was exposed in Pentagon documents supporting jihadist terrorists in Syria from the beginning.  
A 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report revealed that the Obama administration knew al-Qaeda was leading the rebellion in Syria, supported it anyway, and that one of the goals of supporting the terrorist-led “revolution” was to create a “salafist principality,” today known as the Islamic State, in Eastern Syria.

THE BELOW WILL GIVE YOU SOME INSIGHT WHY GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN WAS SET UP:

Top U.S. intelligence officials later confirmed publicly that, despite being advised not to by military officials, Obama deliberately aided terrorists under the guise of helping “moderate” jihadists overthrow Assad. Former DIA chief Michael Flynn, who led the military-intelligence agency at the time, told Al Jazeera that Obama and other top officials knew exactly what they were doing. “I don’t know that they turned a blind eye, I think it was a decision,” said Flynn, who went on to serve for a short period as Trump’s national security advisor. “I think it was a willful decision.” 

The interviewer, Mehdi Hasan, sounded shocked at the frankness and the enormity of the revelation that Obama was willfully aiding terrorists. But Flynn stood firm.

The Republican and Democrat lawmakers behind the bill to stop arming terrorists seem to recognize those facts, too. “For years, the U.S. government has been supporting armed militant groups working directly with and often under the command of terrorist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government,” Representative Gabbard, the chief sponsor of the bill, said in a statement. “Rather than spending trillions of dollars on regime change wars in the Middle East, we should be focused on defeating terrorist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda, and using our resources to invest in rebuilding our communities here at home.”

Gabbard, who traveled to Syria on a fact-finding mission this year and met with government, religious and opposition leaders has been very outspoken about the the U.S. government’s lawless and disastrous intervention in that conflict on behalf of terror groups. “Their message to the American people was powerful and consistent: There is no difference between ‘moderate’ rebels and al-Qaeda (al-Nusra) or ISIS — they are all the same,” Gabbard said, adding that the conflict in Syria is basically “a war between terrorists under the command of groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda and the Syrian government.”

For Representative Gabbard and the group of bipartisan lawmakers joining her effort to end U.S. taxpayer support for terror groups, it is time to ensure that no more American wealth goes to support the savagery of terrorists wreaking havoc across the Middle East. “The fact that American taxpayer dollars are being used to strengthen the very terrorist groups we should be focused on defeating should alarm every member of Congress and every American,” she said. “We call on our colleagues and the Administration to join us in passing this legislation.” 

So far, a solid group of lawmakers including constitutionalists such as Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Ted Yoho of Florida, along with a number of progressives, have joined forces with Gabbard to support the legislation.

 Congresswoman Proposes Radical Solution
to  Refugee  CRISIS!
STOP  ARMING  TERRORISTS!
US Representative Tulsi Gabbard is proving to be quite the thorn in the side of the establishment warmongers. In January, Gabbard went on a secret trip to Syria to investigate first hand and to find the truth that the corporate media is covering up about the Syrian war. Since then, this brave congresswoman has remained steadfast in her mission to show Americans how their tax dollars are funding terrorism in the Middle East.

In a press conference this week, Gabbard called on President Trump to “end the regime change in Syria,” adding that this is what is causing the refugee crisis.
“The most important question is how do we address the cause of these people fleeing their homes,” Gabbard stated before pointing to a bill that she’s submitted to Congress this year that would help in solving this problem.  

The bill’s premise to stop the refugee crisis is quite simple — stop arming the terrorists.  “Stop Arming Terrorists Act,” or HR 608, would ban the use of US taxpayers’ funds to aid terrorist groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda or Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).  “For years our government has been providing both direct and indirect support to these armed militant groups who are working directly with or under the command of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, all in their effort and fight to overthrow the Syrian government,” Gabbard said in an interview Wednesday.

Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/us-congresswoman-drops-bombshell-help-refugees-stop-arming-terrorists/

 Rand Paul Questions if Intervention is 
Creating more TERRORISTS than Killing 
 ** Senate Hearing **
Published on Mar 9, 2017
Senator Rand Paul questions whether US intervention and Bombing has caused more terrorists than it has stopped. Paul also questions why the US is in Yemen in the first place.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/12409-should-pres-obama-be-detained-for-violating-the-ndaa

THE BELOW SPEAKS FOR ITSELF:
 
If Obama is supporting al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces should he be subject to indefinite detention under the terms of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)?

As The New American has chronicled since it was first proposed, the NDAA purportedly authorizes the president of the United States to deploy the armed forces to apprehend and indefinitely detain anyone suspected of providing support to terrorists. Section 1021 of the NDAA reads in relevant part:

Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C.1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.

A ‘covered person’ under this section is any person as follows:

A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.

And finally:

Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.

A plain reading of Section 1021 reveals, then, that anyone who is found to have “substantially supported” al-Qaeda or associated forces can be detained by the military until the end of the War on Terror.  Now, the relevant question becomes: Has Obama substantially supported al-Qaeda and, if so, how?

Advertisement

Declassified CIA document reveals Iraq war had ZERO justification

Source:

Mirror Spectrum

Declassified CIA document reveals Iraq war had zero justification

Originally published March 29, 2016

iraq_war

image

Analysis of a declassified CIA document that reveals the reason behind the war in Iraq proved that the war had no justification.

Now that document has been declassified and it reveals that there was virtually zero justification for the Iraq war. The document reveals that there was “no operational tie between Saddam and al Qaeda” and no WMD programs.

The CIA released a copy of the NIE in 2004 in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, but redacted virtually all of it, citing a threat to national security. Then last year, John Greenewald, who operates The Black Vault, a clearinghouse for declassified government documents, asked the CIA to take another look at the October 2002 NIE to determine whether any additional portions of it could be declassified.

The agency responded to Greenewald this past January and provided him with a new version of the NIE, which he shared exclusively with VICE News, that restores the majority of the prewar Iraq intelligence that has eluded historians, journalists, and war critics for more than a decade. (Some previously redacted portions of the NIE had previously been disclosed in congressional reports.)

For the first time, the public can now read the hastily drafted CIA document [pdf below] that led Congress to pass a joint resolution authorizing the use of military force in Iraq, a costly war launched March 20, 2003 that was predicated on “disarming” Iraq of its (non-existent) WMD, overthrowing Saddam Hussein, and “freeing” the Iraqi people.

A report issued by the RAND Corporation last December titled “Blinders, Blunders and Wars” said the NIE “contained several qualifiers that were dropped…. As the draft NIE went up the intelligence chain of command, the conclusions were treated increasingly definitively.”

An example of that: According to the newly declassified NIE, the intelligence community concluded that Iraq “probably has renovated a [vaccine] production plant” to manufacture biological weapons “but we are unable to determine whether [biological weapons] agent research has resumed.” The NIE also said Hussein did not have “sufficient material” to manufacture any nuclear weapons. But in an October 7, 2002 speech in Cincinnati, Ohio, then-President George W. Bush simply said Iraq, “possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons” and “the evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.”

One of the most significant parts of the NIE revealed for the first time is the section pertaining to Iraq’s alleged links to al Qaeda. In September 2002, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld claimed the US had “bulletproof” evidence linking Hussein’s regime to the terrorist group.

“We do have solid evidence of the presence in Iraq of al Qaeda members, including some that have been in Baghdad,” Rumsfeld said. “We have what we consider to be very reliable reporting of senior-level contacts going back a decade, and of possible chemical- and biological-agent training.”

But the NIE said its information about a working relationship between al Qaeda and Iraq was based on “sources of varying reliability” — like Iraqi defectors — and it was not at all clear that Hussein had even been aware of a relationship, if in fact there were one.

“As with much of the information on the overall relationship, details on training and support are second-hand,” the NIE said. “The presence of al-Qa’ida militants in Iraq poses many questions. We do not know to what extent Baghdad may be actively complicit in this use of its territory for safehaven and transit.”

The declassified NIE provides details about the sources of some of the suspect intelligence concerning allegations Iraq trained al Qaeda operatives on chemical and biological weapons deployment — sources like War on Terror detainees who were rendered to secret CIA black site prisons, and others who were turned over to foreign intelligence services and tortured. Congress’s later investigation into prewar Iraq intelligence concluded that the intelligence community based its claims about Iraq’s chemical and biological training provided to al Qaeda on a single source.

“Detainee Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi — who had significant responsibility for training — has told us that Iraq provided unspecified chemical or biological weapons training for two al-Qai’ida members beginning in December 2000,” the NIE says. “He has claimed, however, that Iraq never sent any chemical, biological, or nuclear substances — or any trainers — to al-Qa’ida in Afghanistan.”

Al-Libi was the emir of the Khaldan training camp in Afghanistan, which the Taliban closed prior to 9/11 because al-Libi refused to turn over control to Osama bin Laden.

Last December, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a declassified summary of its so-called Torture Report on the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program. A footnote stated that al-Libi, a Libyan national, “reported while in [redacted] custody that Iraq was supporting al-Qa’ida and providing assistance with chemical and biological weapons.”

“Some of this information was cited by Secretary [of State Colin] Powell in his speech to the United Nations, and was used as a justification for the 2003 invasion of Iraq,” the Senate torture report said. “Ibn Shaykh al-Libi recanted the claim after he was rendered to CIA custody on February [redacted] 2003, claiming that he had been tortured by the [redacted], and only told them what he assessed they wanted to hear.”

Al-Libi reportedly committed suicide in a Libyan prison in 2009, about a month after human rights investigators met with him.

The NIE goes on to say that “none of the [redacted] al-Qa’ida members captured during [the Afghanistan war] report having been trained in Iraq or by Iraqi trainers elsewhere, but given al-Qa’ida’s interest over the years in training and expertise from outside sources, we cannot discount reports of such training entirely.”

All told, this is the most damning language in the NIE about Hussein’s links to al Qaeda: “While the Iraqi president “has not endorsed al-Qa’ida’s overall agenda and has been suspicious of Islamist movements in general, apparently he has not been averse to some contacts with the organization.”

The NIE suggests that the CIA had sources within the media to substantiate details about meetings between al Qaeda and top Iraqi government officials held during the 1990s and 2002 — but some were not very reliable. “Several dozen additional direct or indirect meetings are attested to by less reliable clandestine and press sources over the same period,” the NIE says.

The RAND report noted, “The fact that the NIE concluded that there was no operational tie between Saddam and al Qaeda did not offset this alarming assessment.”

The NIE also restores another previously unknown piece of “intelligence”: a suggestion that Iraq was possibly behind the letters laced with anthrax sent to news organizations and senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy a week after the 9/11 attacks. The attacks killed five people and sickened 17 others.

“We have no intelligence information linking Iraq to the fall 2001 attacks in the United States, but Iraq has the capability to produce spores of Bacillus anthracis — the causative agent of anthrax — similar to the dry spores used in the letters,” the NIE said. “The spores found in the Daschle and Leahy letters are highly purified, probably requiring a high level of skill and expertise in working with bacterial spores. Iraqi scientists could have such expertise,” although samples of a biological agent Iraq was known to have used as an anthrax simulant “were not as pure as the anthrax spores in the letters.”

Paul Pillar, a former veteran CIA analyst for the Middle East who was in charge of coordinating the intelligence community’s assessments on Iraq, told VICE news that “the NIE’s bio weapons claims” was based on unreliable sources such as Ahmad Chalabi, the former head of the Iraqi National Congress, an opposition group supported by the US.

“There was an insufficient critical skepticism about some of the source material,” he now says about the unredacted NIE. “I think there should have been agnosticism expressed in the main judgments. It would have been a better paper if it were more carefully drafted in that sort of direction.”

But Pillar, now a visiting professor at Georgetown University, added that the Bush administration had already made the decision to go to war in Iraq, so the NIE “didn’t influence [their] decision.” Pillar added that he was told by congressional aides that only a half-dozen senators and a few House members read past the NIE’s five-page summary.

David Kay, a former Iraq weapons inspector who also headed the Iraq Survey Group, told Frontline that the intelligence community did a “poor job” on the NIE, “probably the worst of the modern NIE’s, partly explained by the pressure, but more importantly explained by the lack of information they had. And it was trying to drive towards a policy conclusion where the information just simply didn’t support it.”

The most controversial part of the NIE, which has been picked apart hundreds of times over the past decade and has been thoroughly debunked, pertained to a section about Iraq’s attempts to acquire aluminum tubes. The Bush administration claimed that this was evidence that Iraq was pursuing a nuclear weapon.

National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice stated at the time on CNN that the tubes “are only really suited for nuclear weapons programs, centrifuge programs,” and that “we don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.”

The version of the NIE released in 2004 redacted the aluminum tubes section in its entirety. But the newly declassified assessment unredacts a majority of it and shows that the intelligence community was unsure why “Saddam is personally interested in the procurement of aluminum tubes.” The US Department of Energy concluded that the dimensions of the aluminum tubes were “consistent with applications to rocket motors” and “this is the more likely end use.”

The CIA’s unclassified summary of the NIE did not contain the Energy Department’s dissent.

“Apart from being influenced by policymakers’ desires, there were several other reasons that the NIE was flawed,” the RAND study concluded. “Evidence on mobile biological labs, uranium ore purchases from Niger, and unmanned-aerial-vehicle delivery systems for WMDs all proved to be false. It was produced in a hurry. Human intelligence was scarce and unreliable. While many pieces of evidence were questionable, the magnitude of the questionable evidence had the effect of making the NIE more convincing and ominous. The basic case that Saddam had WMDs seemed more plausible to analysts than the alternative case that he had destroyed them. And analysts knew that Saddam had a history of deception, so evidence against Saddam’s possession of WMDs was often seen as deception.”

According to the latest figures compiled by Iraq Body Count, to date more than 200,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed, although other sources say the casualties are twice as high. More than 4,000 US soldiers have been killed in Iraq, and tens of thousands more have been injured and maimed. The war has cost US taxpayers more than $800 billion.

In an interview with VICE founder Shane Smith, Obama said the rise of the Islamic State was a direct result of the disastrous invasion.

“ISIL is a direct outgrowth of al Qaeda in Iraq that grew out of our invasion,” Obama said. “Which is an example of unintended consequences. Which is why we should generally aim before we shoot.”

Iraq October 2002 NIE on WMDs (unedacted version)

(News.vice.com, Yournewswire.com)

office@mirrorspectrum.com

© Copyright 2016, All Rights Reserved

Note from Angel4Light:

I have known for sometime but like so many who were blinded by the fluoride, mercury lights. Gmo, Chemtrails and vaccines I was apathetic only because we felt there was nothing we could do.  The first step is your leap out of the Matrix the evil ones had you locked into.

The reason they are ramping up their eugenics programs on the populations is because people are waking up and Truth is being outed at every turn. What use to be classified as conspiracy theories have been proven as facts and the face of terrorism has shown itself as the very ones who We The People had entrusted with our safty and to find out the things thst have been done to us as a people has been hard to swallow.

We The People (mankind) need to stick together and work towards a positive solution to all the madness that we have dealt with.

Many of us, if not all of us have suffered from the evils this group of Psychopaths have wheeled upon our Nation and our World.

There are people doing good deeds and need your help, so come out of your comfort zone and step up. We as a Species don’t have much time left to right the wrongs that have been done.  Be at Peace, keep GOD in your heart, pray, meditate and do good for your fellow man and all life.

Be blessed

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Thank You President Trump

Draining The SwampDecember 15, 2018
Pray for President Trump, the White Hats, our Military and all benevolent beings helping to Free Humanity . Be in JOY and in PEACE. Love others as you Love yourself. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Be an example of Love and Joy. Peace will be ours and so it is.

Angel4Light777@gmail.com

Join 2,137 other followers