Six Italian Courts Have Ruled that Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors

Six Italian Courts Have Ruled that Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors

By Martine Vriens and Dafna Tachover

Source: Waking Times

On January 13, 2020, Turin’s Court of Appeals confirmed a 2017 decision determining that a former Telecom Italia worker’s acoustic neuroma (a benign tumor in the ear) was caused by his mobile phone use. This is the sixth time that an Italian court has affirmed a causal link between cell phone use and brain tumors, including decisions by the High Court of Italy.

The Appellate court reached its decision after a review of the evidence and after receiving the opinion of two court-appointed experts. The experts referred the court to studies indicating that individuals who speak on their phones for an average of 30 minutes a day for at least 10 years increase their risk of developing head tumors. After considering this evidence, the Appellate court in Turin stated, “There are solid elements to affirm a causal role between the exposure of the person to radiofrequencies from mobile phones and the disease that arose.”

… studies provided by the defense—which denied a causal link—were mostly industry-funded and, therefore, should be given less weight because of conflicts of interest.

Crucially, the Turin court stated that the studies provided by the defense—which denied a causal link—were mostly industry-funded and, therefore, should be given less weight because of conflicts of interest. Studies by members of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCHENIHR) also suffer from conflicts of interest, according to the Turin court, because these organizations likewise receive funding from industry. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) International EMF Project and many countries around the world have adopted the industry-funded ICNIRP’s recommendations as their safety guidelines. Thus, these statements by the court—calling out the influence of industry funding and conflicts of interest—are extremely significant.

The Turin court’s ruling affirmed the decision of the court of Ivera from 2017. Roberto Romeo, age 57, used his cell phone for three to four hours of each working day for 15 years. He was diagnosed with acoustic neuroma in 2010, and his acoustic nerve had to be removed. As reported in The Guardian, “A medical expert estimated the damage to Romeo at 23% of his bodily function, prompting the judge to make a compensation award of €500 per month to be paid by INAIL, a national insurance program covering workplace accidents.”

Earlier court decisions

Acoustic neuromas are tumors that develop on the main nerve leading from the inner ear to the brain. This nerve influences balance and hearing. Pressure from an acoustic neuroma can cause hearing loss, ringing in the ear and unsteadiness, occasionally also interfering with brain functioning. Acoustic neuroma is also known as “vestibular schwannoma” because it develops on the Schwann cells covering the nerve. Of note, the U.S. government’s $25 million National Toxicology Program cell phone study found that exposure to cell phone radiation caused schwannoma-type tumors.

Newsweek mistakenly reported the Ivrea case as the first Italian ruling linking cell phones and acoustic neuromas, but it was in fact the second. The first ruling, made by a court in Brescia on December 10, 2009 and affirmed by the High Court of Italy in 2012, granted worker’s compensation to an industrial plant’s financial manager, Mr. Marcolini, who developed a tumor after using cell and cordless phones for five to six hours a day for 12 years. Marcolini was diagnosed as having a benign tumor on the trigeminal nerve, which controls facial muscles and sensations. As in Turin, the Brescia court ignored industry-funded studies—declaring them to be biased—and instead relied on the expert opinion of Swedish professor Lennart Hardell, an oncology specialist and cancer epidemiologist with “a focused interest in environmental risk factors for cancer.”

The next (third) ruling to link cell phone use and acute nerve disease was made by a Florence court in April 2017. The Florence court ordered INAIL to compensate a salesperson who developed an acoustic neuroma after using the phone for two to three hours a day on the job for 10 years.
An occupational hazard

On January 30, 2019, an Italian court in the city of Monza ruled that exposure to cell phone radiation caused an airport employee’s acoustic neuroma brain tumor. The employee had used a cell phone for well over 10 years for his work. After being diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma in 2010, the employee was declared (in 2011) 68% disabled and permanently unfit for work. In 2014, he applied to INAIL, claiming a causal link between his workplace exposure to radiation and the acoustic neuroma and asking that his tumor be recognized as an occupational disease. The Monza court concurred that the tumor had permanently incapacitated him and ruled it to be an occupational disease. When the defense appealed the decision, Italy’s Supreme Court upheld it.

Basing their determination on the duration of exposure, the types of devices used, the type of pathology and their review of the literature, they determined the evidence to be sufficient for a causal link, even in the absence of absolutely conclusive scientific evidence.

Over a period from 1994 to 2010, the airport employee’s job had exposed him to high levels of radiofrequency and microwave radiation from a variety of antennas and high-frequency equipment, including altitude signal repeaters, weather radars, satellite antennas and airplane equipment. In addition, the performance of his job required the use of numerous radiation-emitting devices, including mobile phones, two always-on PCs and signal repeaters (GSM and DECT). Holding the phone on the left side of his head, the employee used a Siemens DECT (cordless) phone, a Nokia and later a Samsung cell phone for more than four hours a day, with phone sessions lasting up to 45 consecutive minutes. Several times, the employee and his colleagues reported the high levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and radiation to their employer, asking for the EMFs and radiation to be measured, but higher-ups ignored these requests.

In the Italian legal system, judges can appoint technical experts called court technical experts (CTUs). In the Monza case, the experts and technical advisers assigned to evaluate the case conducted research into acoustic neuroma and its risk factors. Basing their determination on the duration of exposure (exposure to high-frequency EMR for a considerable number of hours per day for over 10 years), the types of devices used, the type of pathology and their review of the literature, they determined the evidence to be sufficient for a causal link, even in the absence of absolutely conclusive scientific evidence. They also referenced the Brescia court’s decision and the studies cited in that decision. Their conclusion was that the development of the left auditory nerve neuroma was related to the employee’s workplace exposures and that the tumor had caused a reduction in the employee’s mental and physical health.

Thus, in case after case, Italian courts have determined that the radiofrequency and microwave radiation emitted by cell phones can cause acoustic-neuroma-type brain tumors. The importance of these decisions should not be underestimated, particularly given the courts’ recognition that when exposure to electromagnetic radiation becomes a necessary part of the job, acoustic neuromas are an occupational risk.

Microwaves Are Killing Us

You Know Microwaves Are Bad For You But This Is What You Didn’t Know


By Life Well Lived 
You Know Microwaves Are Bad For You But This Is What You Didn’t Know
Subscriber channel Life Well Lived https://goo.gl/oJ3EdI 

Disclaimer: Please consult a physician before beginning any treatment program or making any adjustment to your health care, diet, and/or lifestyle. Do not remove yourself from any prescribed medications or treatments without consulting your doctor. Any and all dietary supplements or nutritional products and treatments discussed on this video are not intended to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease. The information contained in this video is for general information and for educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this video is or shall be or considered, or used as a substitute for, medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should always seek the advice of a physician with any questions regarding their health or medical condition. Never disregard, avoid, or delay obtaining medical advice or following the advice of a physician because of something you have seen or watch on this video.

*******

Note from Angel4Light:

Okay so I don’t really trust doctors. But there are some out there worth listening to and these are the ones that I will share they’re wonderful information with you. Therefore I am including a very interesting article from one of my favorite doctors.

It’s not that all doctors are bad, they don’t know because they haven’t been trained properly. They have gone to the Rothschilds School of sickness how to  perpetuate the almighty dollar. It should be called sick care and not Healthcare. 

Thank goodness all of this will be changing soon enough and the cures and true information can be freely given to all of us.

Nameste’

******

How Your Microwave Oven Damages Your Health In Multiple Ways

By Dr. Mercola

If you want to use food to optimize your health, it is helpful to pay attention not only to the food quality but also how you prepare it, being careful to use methods that do not seriously impair food quality
Studies suggest microwaving your food could expose you to carcinogenic toxins released from plastic or paper wrappers, and destroy valuable nutrients in the food
A Swiss food scientist found that microwaved food increased cholesterol levels, decreased red and white blood cell counts, decreased hemoglobin and produced radiolytic compounds

By now, you probably know that what you eat has a profound impact on your health. The mantra, “You are what you eat” is really true. But you need to consider not only what you buy, but also how you cook it. When it comes to microwave ovens, the price for convenience is to compromise your health.

In this article, I will review what we know about the effects microwaves have on your food and on your health. Hopefully I will convince you to get rid of your microwave as even when you are using it to sterilize kitchen sponges, it contaminates your environment with biologically damaging radiation.

Sad State of Our Soils

Over the past century, the quality of fresh food has declined due to soil depletion, unsustainable industrial farming practices, overproduction of crops and the use of artificial fertilizers and toxic pesticides and herbicides such as glyphosate, which acts as a mineral chelator. You can no longer assume you’re getting all of the vitamins, minerals, enzymes and phytonutrients you need by eating a multitude of fresh produce, even if you’re eating organic foods.

Not surprisingly, the amount of nutrition in a calorie of food has been reduced over the past 50 years. Three recent studies of historical food composition have shown 5 to 40 percent declines in some of the minerals in fresh produce, and another study found a similar decline in our protein sources.1

So, now more than ever, you must be careful to maximize the “bang for your buck” when it comes to the foods you eat. Research shows your microwave oven will not help you in these efforts. Instead, it will in fact threaten your health by violently ripping the molecules in your food apart, rendering some nutrients inert at best, and carcinogenic at its worst.

Convenience Poses Toxic Threat in More Ways Than One

Microwaves heat food by causing water molecules to vibrate 2.5 billion times per second, eventually turning to steam that heats your food. While your microwave can rapidly heat a dish, it also alters the food’s chemical structure. Structures of the water molecules are torn apart and forcefully deformed. This is different than conventional heating of food, whereby heat is transferred convectionally from the outside inward.

Contrary to popular belief, microwaved foods don’t actually cook from the inside out. Microwave cooking begins within the molecules where water is present. Since not all areas contain the same amount of water, the heating is uneven. When thicker foods are cooked, microwaves heat the outer layers, and the inner layers are cooked mostly by the conduction of heat from the hot outer layers, inward.

Our knowledge of the danger has radically increased since microwave ovens were first introduced to consumers more than 40 years ago. Besides depleting your food’s nutritional value, which will be addressed later in this article, microwave ovens can produce carcinogenic toxins in more ways than one.

When plastic is heated, toxic chemicals like BPA and phthalates can leach out of the containers or covers, contaminating your food with endocrine and hormone disruptors. A paper published in 1990 reported the leakage of many toxic chemicals from the packaging of common microwavable foods, including pizzas, chips and popcorn. Chemicals included polyethylene terpthalate (PET), and well-documented carcinogens like dioxin, benzene, toluene and xylene.

In addition to that, heterocyclic amines (HCAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and advanced glycation end products (AGEs), known as glycotoxins, also form whenever food is cooked at high heat. All three of these are known carcinogens. These compounds are not present in raw food; more than 90 percent of our exposure to these carcinogens comes from cooked food, including microwaved foods.

How Microwaves Damage Your Health

You might not be aware of this, but microwave ovens operate on gigahertz frequencies very similar to most 4G cellular networks. So, the danger AND the justifications why are identical. Conventional science and industry are clinging to the concept that these microwaves from your cell phones, portable phones, Wi-Fi routers, smart meters and wireless computers and tablets are not harmful because they do not cause any thermal damage.

New research3,4,5,6 from Professor Emeritus Martin Pall, Ph.D., has provided us with the mechanism of how this low level nonthermal microwave exposure causes biological harm. It has to do with voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs) that are embedded in the cell membranes. He determined this by evaluating over two dozen studies showing you can radically reduce biological microwave damage using calcium channel blockers.

This explains why the argument that the microwave radiation is not high enough to cause thermal damage is fatally flawed. The statement is partially correct, as the radiation does not cause thermal damage. However, it causes massive biological damage. Pall has compiled a list of 123 studies and papers documenting the various non-thermal health effects of EMFs for those who want to take a deep-dive into the research. The safety standards that have been established are off by a factor of over 7 million.

So just how does it cause damage? Well, once the VGCCs are activated by microwaves, about 1 million calcium ions per second, these ions then stimulate the release of nitric oxide, which combines with superoxide to form peroxynitrate. These peroxynitrates then create hydroxyl free radicals, the most destructive free radicals known to man, which decimate mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, membranes and proteins that lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, the core of most chronic disease.

Pall has calculated that these VGCCs are over 7 million times more sensitive to microwave radiation than the charged particles inside and outside the cell, which means the currently established safety standards are off by a factor of over 7 MILLION.

Interestingly, the tissues with the highest density of VGCCs are the brain and nerve tissue like the pacemaker in the heart, and also in the testes. This could explain why we are having an exponential increase in many diseases like autism, Alzheimer’s, arrhythmias, anxiety, depression and male infertility. Indeed, in a 2016 paper, Pall documents how microwave EMFs produce “widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression.”7

Microwave radiation does not have enough energy to directly break covalent bonds and damage your DNA in the way that ionizing radiation from X- or gamma rays do. However, it can actually cause more DNA damage than ionizing radiation as a byproduct of the increased hydroxyl free radical production.

Failure to realize this and take steps to minimize exposure not only will damage your DNA and increase your risk of most chronic illness, but also seriously impair your body’s ability to remove toxins, and significantly impair your immune response to address the large variety of pathogenic infectious assaults you regularly encounter, especially parasites.

It is important to understand that using your microwave oven will expose you to an energy density of milliwatts per square centimeter (the standard energy unit measurement in the U.S.). While that sounds like a small number that will not cause thermal damage, it is easily thousands if not millions of times higher than the energy density shown to cause biological damage in hundreds of studies, as biological damage typically shows up in the micro to picowatt range.

So, every time you turn on your microwave oven, you are exposing yourself to microwave radiation densities thousands of times higher than your cellphone. This is the primary reason why I strongly advise removing the microwave from your home. Next, I will review some of the evidence showing how microwaves damage your food. But remember, this is a relatively minor issue compared to the DIRECT biological damage it will cause you and your family every time you turn it on. The closer you are to the oven, the higher the energy density and the worse the damage will be.

Microwaving Produces Toxins in Nearly All Types of Food

As noted in the book, “Electromagnetic Health: Making Sense of the Research and Practical Solutions for Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) and Radio Frequencies (RF),” written by a naturopath, Case Adams:8

  • Research … at the University of California Lawrence Livermore Laboratory concluded that microwaves produced heterocyclic aromatic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Both are suspected carcinogens. Frying meats also produces polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons …

While HCAs and PAHs are formed in protein, and AGEs form in protein and carbohydrate foods, Lita Lee, Ph.D., cites research from the Atlantis Rising Educational Center in Oregon in her 1989 book, “Microwaves and Microwave Ovens,” which showed carcinogens form in nearly all types of food during microwaving.9

Aside from HCAs and PAHs, microwaving meat also produces the carcinogen d-nitrosodiethanolamine. When microwaving milk and grains, the amino acids are converted into carcinogenic compounds. Even thawing frozen fruit in your microwave will cause glucosides and galactosides in the fruit to convert into carcinogenic compounds. Ditto for plant foods, in which alkaloids are converted into carcinogens and hazardous free radicals. It doesn’t even end there. As cited in “Electromagnetic Health”:

  • A 1989 study published in the Lancet found microwaving infant formula converted trans-amino acids into cis-isomers, which are classified as neurotoxins and nephrotoxins, meaning they’re toxic to your nerves and kidneys respectively.10
  • In a 1991 paper, Swiss food scientist Dr. Hans Ulrich Hertel reported that microwaved food produced carcinogenic effects in the bloodstream.11 It was a small study, consisting of only eight volunteers who drank either raw milk, cooked milk, pasteurized milk or microwave-cooked milk, and organic raw vegetables, cooked conventionally-grown vegetables, organic or conventional frozen vegetables that were then warmed in the microwave, or organic or conventional veggies fully cooked in the microwave.
  • Before and after each meal, blood tests were taken. Those who ate either microwaved milk or vegetables had decreased hemoglobin levels, increased cholesterol levels, decreased white and red blood cells, and decreased lymphocyte levels, the latter of which suggests increased infection or tissue damage. While there are shortcomings and limitations to this study, the results offer food for thought.
  • Hertel also found that when food molecules are deformed by microwaving, radiolytic compounds are formed. Subsequent research suggests these too appear to have carcinogenic potential.12
  • Not surprisingly, Hertel’s study was met with great resistance from those with much to lose. The Swiss electrical appliance establishment lobbied to shut Hertel down, and he was eventually tried and found guilty of “interfering with commerce.” American journalist Tom Valentine visited Hertel in Germany in 1992, penning a now classic article on his research.13

The study was not without its shortcomings. It involved only eight participants, of which Hertel was one. As compelling as his findings were, his methodology did not stand up to the scientific rigors of the field. But in spite of Hertel’s methodological shortcomings, his findings do raise concerns about what this form of radiation is doing to your food and should be taken as a launching point to larger, more robust studies in the future.

Hertel wrote: “There are no atoms, molecules, or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any period of time. This will happen even given the microwave oven’s low power range of milliwatts.”

Do Microwaves Leak Radiation?

Early microwave models were frequently thought to carry a risk of microwave radiation leaking out while in operation. Modern microwaves undergo more rigorous testing, rendering such risks slim to none if you are evaluating thermal damage only. However, when you look at biological damage, the energy densities are highly biologically significant.

The FDA limits the amount of microwaves that can leak from an oven throughout its lifetime to 5 milliwatts (mW) per square centimeter at approximately 2 inches from the oven surface. Because microwave energy decreases dramatically as you move away from the source of the radiation, a measurement made 20 inches from your oven would be approximately one-hundredth of the value measured at 2 inches. However, remember that biological effects have been well-documented at 0.01 MICROwatts, which is half a million times lower than the FDA standard.

Microwave Radiation Affects Your Heart


 A study 16 published in 2010 examined the effects of 2.4 GHz radiation, which is the frequency of radiation emitted by Wi-Fi routers and microwave ovens, on the heart, finding “unequivocal evidence” that microwave frequency radiation affects the heart at non-thermal levels that are well below federal safety guidelines. According to Magda Havas, Ph.D., of Trent University:

“This is the first study that documents immediate and dramatic changes in both heart rate and heart rate variability caused by an approved device that generates microwaves at levels well below (0.3 percent) federal guidelines in both Canada and the United States.”

  • This is precisely what one would predict, as the density of the VGCCs are highest in nerve tissue like the pacemaker of the heart. This is why, if you know anyone being treated for an arrhythmia, you need to inform them of this as there is a high probability that their arrhythmia is related to their microwave exposure from cellphones, Wi-Fi, portable phones and smart meters.

VGCCs in the brain are also very sensitive to this and are responsible for releasing neurotransmitters and neuroendocrine hormones, which could contribute to depression, anxiety, ADHD and autism. Anyone with these health challenges would be best served mitigating microwave radiation exposure.

Microwaving Destroys Nutrients

There has been surprisingly little research on how microwaves affect organic molecules, or how the human body responds to consuming microwaved food. Considering most modern households use a microwave, you’d expect it to have been thoroughly investigated for safety, not only in terms of standing near it during operation, but also in terms of its impact on the food. Sadly, that’s not the case.

The handful of studies that have been done generally agree, for the most part, that microwaving food damages its nutritional value. Heating food, in and of itself, can result in some nutrient loss, but using microwaves to heat food introduces the additional problem of the “microwave effect,” a phenomenon that will be discussed in detail later.

The majority of studies on microwaves and nutrition were conducted prior to 2000, I suspect because the focus of radiation research of late has shifted toward a more ominous threat: environmental radiation from electromagnetic devices such as cellphones and computers. Nevertheless, some excellent scientific data has been gathered regarding the detrimental effects of microwaves on the nutrients in your food:

6 Pictures


Microwave Sickness

When your tissues are directly exposed to microwaves, the same violent deformations occur and can cause “microwave sickness.” People who have been exposed to high levels of microwave radiation experience a variety of symptoms, including:

  • Insomnia, night sweats and various sleep disturbances
  • Swollen lymph nodes and a weakened immune system
  • Headaches and dizziness
  • Impaired cognition
  • Depression and irritability
  • Nausea and appetite loss
  • Vision and eye problems
  • Frequent urination and extreme thirst

There is a good amount of data emerging that people are suffering, to various degrees, these kinds of symptoms from living next to cellphone towers and other high-frequency radiation emitting antennas, which emit microwaves around the clock. According to Professor Franz Adlkofer, a leading scientist in the area of biological effects of EMF fields:23

“There is real evidence that hyperfrequency electromagnetic fields can have geno-toxic effects. And this damaged DNA is always the cause of cancer. We’ve found these damaging effects on the genes at levels well below the safety limits. That’s why we think it’s urgent to base our safety limits on the biological effects, not the thermic ones. They should be based on biology, not on physics.”

Breaking Free of Your Microwave: A Few Basic Tips

Hopefully, I have provided you with enough compelling information to stop using your microwave. If real estate in your kitchen is at a premium, your microwave should probably be the first thing to go. Contrary to popular belief, you can survive quite well without it. I tossed mine out last year and replaced it with a similar sized steam convention oven that cooks nearly as quickly as a microwave but safer. You can also:

Plan ahead. Take your dinner out of the freezer that morning or the night before so you don’t end up having to scramble to defrost a 5-pound chunk of beef two hours before dinnertime.
Make soups and stews in bulk, and then freeze them in gallon-sized freezer bags or other containers. An hour before meal time, just take one out and defrost it in a sink of water until it’s thawed enough to slip into a pot, then reheat it on the stove. Preparing batches of meals in advance will also ensure you always have a good meal available on days when you’re too busy or too tired to cook.
Consider eating more organic raw foods. This is the best way to and improve your health over the long run.
A toaster oven makes a great faux-microwave for heating up leftovers. Keep it at a low temperature (200 to 250 degrees F) and gently warm a plate of food over the course of 20 to 30 minutes. Better yet, a steam convection oven that can likely fit in the opening left when you toss out your microwave oven.

Sources and References



Disclaimer: The entire contents of this article is based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

If you want to use an article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.

© Copyright 1997-2018 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.



Mercola.com

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695

CDC Forced To Release Documents Showing They Knew Vaccine Preservative Causes Autism

Source:
Health Logics

CDC forced to release documents showing they knew vaccine preservative causes autism

April 6, 2016

By lussy

PhD Scientist and Biochemist reveals Hidden CDC documents showing Thimerosal In Vaccines increase Neurologic problems
The CDC has been shunning the correlations among thimerosal and neurological disorders for a totally long term. Despite the fact that the FDA gave a two year deadline to get rid of the mercury based preservative from vaccines after the neurotoxin was banned in 1999, it nonetheless remains to at the present time in 60 percentage of flu vaccines. A vaccine industry watchdog has now received CDC documents that display statistically tremendous dangers of autism associated with the vaccine preservative, something the CDC denies even if confronted with their very own information.

For nearly ten years, Brian Hooker has been soliciting for documents which might be kept under tight wraps through the facilities for disorder manipulate and Prevention (CDC). His greater than a hundred Freedom of records Act (FOIA) requests have led to copious evidence that the vaccine preservative Thimerosal, which continues to be used inside the flu shot this is administered to pregnant ladies and toddlers, can purpose autism and different neurodevelopmental disorders.

Dr. Hooker, a PhD scientist, worked with participants of Congress to craft the letter to the CDC that these days ended in his obtaining long-awaited facts from the CDC, the significance of that’s historic. According to Hooker, the facts on over four hundred,000 babies born among 1991 and 1997, which turned into analyzed through CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD, “proves unequivocally that during 2000, CDC officers were knowledgeable internally of the very high hazard of autism, non-natural sleep problem and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure.”

Factually, thimerosal is a mercury-containing compound that may be a regarded human carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and immune-gadget disruptor at degrees underneath 1 component-in line with-million, and a compound to which some human beings can have an anaphylactic surprise reaction. It’s also a recognized reproductive and fetal toxin with out a hooked up toxicologically safe degree of publicity for human beings.

In November, 1997, the U.S. Congress surpassed the meals and Drug administration Modernization Act, requiring the study of mercury content in FDA-authorized merchandise. The review disclosed the hitherto-unrecognized degrees of ethylmercury in vaccines.

In July 1999, public-fitness officials introduced that thimerosal could be phased out of vaccines. The CDC, American Academy of Pediatrics, and FDA insisted that the degree became basically precautionary. They asked of all vaccine manufacturers to put off mercury from vaccines.

The requests were denied by using vaccine manufacturers and continued each yr thereafter.

The FDA does not require ingredients that include much less than 1 percent of a product to be divulged at the label, so a lot more products may have thimerosal and customers will never realize.

Extended threat of Autism
while the consequences of the Verstraeten take a look at had been first suggested outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that everyone however Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had acknowledged of the very high 7.6-fold multiplied relative danger of autism from publicity to Thimerosal during infancy. But now, clean proof exists. A newly-acquired summary from 1999 titled, “expanded threat of developmental neurologic impairment after excessive exposure to Thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of lifestyles” required the approval of pinnacle CDC officials previous to its presentation at the Epidemic Intelligence carrier (EIS) convention. Thimerosal, that is 50% mercury by using weight, became used in most early life vaccines and in the RhoGAM shot for pregnant ladies previous to the early 2000s.The CDC keeps there may be “no relationship among Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism quotes in children,” despite the fact that the records from the CDC’s very own Vaccine protection Datalink (VSD) database shows a totally high risk. There are a number of public facts to lower back this up, consisting of this Congressional file from may 1, 2003. The CDC’s refusal to renowned thimerosal’s dangers is exemplified by means of a leaked announcement from Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the CDC/NIH-sponsored Immunization safety assessment at IOM. Regarding vaccination, she stated in 2001, “…we are not ever going to come back down that it [autism] is a real facet impact…” also of note, the former director of the CDC, which purchases $four billion worth of vaccines annually, is now president of Merck’s vaccine department.

Poisonous consequences of Thimerosal not Disputed by means of medical observe

image

There are dozens of medical inquiries and studies on the negative results of thimerosal, inclusive of gastrointestinal abnormalities and immune gadget irregularities.

Thimerosal, is metabolized (transformed) into the poisonous and “dangerous” methylmercury. After which in turn, the dangerous methylmercury is metabolized (converted) into the maximum harmful, lengthy-time period-toxic, “inorganic” mercury that is retained in physical tissue.

“Inorganic” mercury is the give up product of mercury metabolism. Methylmercury problem businesses confirm that the metabolic pathway for mercury within the human and animal body consists inside the discount/conversion of the dangerous methylmercury into a more dangerous “inorganic” mercury that is tissue-bound, and lengthy-term-toxic. Hence, each the originating substance (methylmercury) and its conversion/discount, inorganic mercury are found.

Based totally on published findings by using Dr. Paul King, the metabolic pathway for natural mercury entails the conversion of Ethylmercury (Thimerosal) into “methylmercury” after which the in addition discount of “methylmercury” into inorganic mercury.

image

Congress must Act
Dr. Hooker’s fervent hope for the future: “We have to make certain that this and different proof of CDC malfeasance are supplied to Congress and the general public as quick as viable. Time is of the essence. Kids’s futures are at stake.” A divide inside the autism network has caused some activists traumatic that compensation to those with vaccine-injury claims be the pinnacle precedence before Congress. Dr. Hooker maintains that prevention, “defensive our maximum precious resource — children’s minds,” need to come first. “Our elected officials must be informed about authorities corruption that continues docs and sufferers within the darkish approximately vaccine dangers.”

image

Regarding an organisation that has visible its percentage of controversy this past year, Dr. Hooker remarked, “it’s miles unlucky that SafeMinds issued a press release on my records, is accepting credit score for my paintings and has no longer supported a international ban on Thimerosal.”

Brian Hooker, PhD, PE, has 15 years enjoy in the area of bioengineering and is an associate professor at Simpson college in which he makes a speciality of biology and chemistry. His over 50 technology and engineering papers were published in across the world identified, peer-reviewed journals. Dr. Hooker has a son, aged sixteen, who evolved normally but then regressed into autism after receiving Thimerosal-containing vaccines.

image

image

Thank You President Trump

Draining The SwampDecember 15, 2018
Pray for President Trump, the White Hats, our Military and all benevolent beings helping to Free Humanity . Be in JOY and in PEACE. Love others as you Love yourself. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Be an example of Love and Joy. Peace will be ours and so it is.

Angel4Light777@gmail.com

Join 2,133 other followers